EPA gives power to protect water sources back to state and tribal leaders
It’s the latest reversal of a Trump-era policy.
In the latest reversal of a Trump-era policy, the Environmental Protection Agency is restoring a rule that grants states and Native American tribes authority to block pipelines and other energy projects that can pollute rivers, streams, and other waterways.
A provision of the federal Clean Water Act gives states and tribes power to block federal projects that could harm lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands within their borders. But the Trump administration curtailed that review power after complaints from Republican members of Congress and the fossil fuel industry that state officials had used the permitting process to stop new energy projects.
The Trump administration said its actions would advance Donald Trump’s goal to fast-track energy projects such as oil and natural gas pipelines.
Washington state blocked construction of a coal export terminal in 2017, saying there were too many major harmful effects including air pollution, rail safety, and vehicle traffic, while New York regulators stopped a natural gas pipeline, saying it failed to meet standards to protect streams, wetlands and other water resources.
In a statement to the Associated Press, EPA Administrator Michael Regan said the nation has “serious water challenges to address,” adding that he “will not hesitate to correct decisions that weakened the authority of states and tribes to protect their waters.”
Regan vowed to work with state, tribal, and local officials to protect clean water while encouraging “sustainable economic development and vibrant communities.”
The Trump-era rule will remain in place while EPA develops a revised rule, Regan said, but the agency “will continue listening to states and tribes about their concerns … to help address these near-term challenges.”
Regan called restoration of the Section 401 provision an important step to reaffirm the authority of states and tribes to regulate projects that affect water-quality within their borders. Under the provision, a federal agency may not issue a license or permit to conduct any activity that may result in any discharge into navigable waters unless the affected state or tribe certifies that the discharge is in compliance with the Clean Water Act and state law, or waives certification.
In a joint statement in 2019 opposing the Trump administration’s actions, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Trump and his lieutenants were engaged in “a massive power grab that seeks to subordinate states and strip us of our authority to preserve clean water and protect public health.”
When Congress enacted the Clean Water Act in 1972, “it made clear that states — and not the federal government — have the knowledge and expertise to uphold our own water quality standards,” the two Democratic governors said. The actions by the Trump administration were intended to “fabricate a problem that does not exist in order to put corporate interests above the health and safety of hard-working Americans,” they added.
Texas governor and attorney general do little to curb state’s chemical plant crisis
Republicans Greg Abbott and Ken Paxton have taken thousands of dollars in donations from chemical companies and their affiliated PACs.By Jesse Valentine - December 08, 2023
‘We’ve been waiting for this’: Union workers cheer Biden’s hydrogen hub plan
Federal funding for the hub is estimated to bring over 20,000 jobs to the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Delaware area.By Anna Gustafson - October 17, 2023
Wisconsin Native American groups gather for a powwow on the eve of Indigenous Peoples’ Day
'We're here to promote education and awareness about the different Native American tribes in Wisconsin,' said Bruce LaMere, a member of the Ho-Chunk Nation.By Rebekah Sager - October 09, 2023