Trump budget director: Historically successful Meals on Wheels doesn’t work
Meals on Wheels is a successful program and it has the evidence to back it up. Statistical analysis has shown that Meals on Wheels helps seniors stay in their homes. Public health researchers have also found that Meals on Wheels can save states money. And most recently, a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the gold standard test […]

Statistical analysis has shown that Meals on Wheels helps seniors stay in their homes. Public health researchers have also found that Meals on Wheels can save states money. And most recently, a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the gold standard test for whether or not a government program works, showed that Meals on Wheels also provides psychological and health benefits to seniors.
Yet here is what Trump’s Office of Management and Budget director Mick Mulvaney said about Meals on Wheels (which gets hit by the Trump budget by eliminating the Community Development Block Grant program), at the White House briefing on Trump’s budget:
ALEXANDER: …block grants aren’t exclusively about housing, they support a variety of different programs, including, in part, Meals on Wheels, that affects a lot of Americans. In Austin, Texas, today, one organization there that delivers those meals to thousands of elderly says that those citizens will no longer be able to be provided those meals. So, what do you say to those Americans who are ultimately losing out, not on housing, but on other things that are taken out by that budget?
[…]
MULVANEY: Meals on Wheels sounds great. And again that’s a state decision to fund that particular portion. So to take the federal money and give it to the states and say, ‘Look, we want to give you money for programs that don’t work.’ I can’t defend that any more. We cannot defend that any more. We’re $20 trillion in debt. We’re gonna spend money. We’re gonna spend a lot of money, but we’re not gonna spend it on programs that cannot show that they’re gonna actually deliver the promises that we’ve made to people.
Kali Thomas, the researcher who led the 2015 randomized controlled trial examining Meals on Wheels’ effectiveness, detailed the scientific findings of the study that proved Meals on Wheels works:
“We structured this study as a three-arm randomized, controlled trial to determine what effect home-delivered meals may have for older adults, beyond merely providing essential nutrition,” Thomas said. “What we found is that there were statistically significant differences in health benefits among the three groups, with the highest gains recognized among participants living alone who had face-to-face contact via daily deliveries.”
Moreover, Ellie Hollander, President and Chief Executive Officer of Meals on Wheels America, is a Results for America Moneyball for Government All-Star. That means that she, along with other local, state and national leaders support the following principles:
1 – Build evidence about the practices, policies, and programs that will achieve the most effective and efficient results so that policymakers can make better decisions;
2 – Invest limited taxpayer dollars in practices, policies, and programs that use data, evidence, and evaluation to demonstrate how they work; and
3 – Direct funds away from practices, policies, and programs that consistently fail to achieve desired outcomes.
Meals on Wheels is an evidence-based program led by a leader who is deeply committed to delivering results for the people Meals on Wheels serves.
The Trump administration would do well to learn more about it.
And they would do well to support it.
Recommended

Brad Schimel touts support of sheriff who backed voter fraud myths
Dodge County Sheriff Dale Schmidt pushed far-right talking points on ballot drop boxes and school shootings.
By Jesse Valentine - March 25, 2025
Senate Republicans scrap consumer protections for payment apps
The move has been criticized by voters across the political spectrum, including some on the far-right.
By Jesse Valentine - March 10, 2025
GOP lawsuits aim to overturn election results in tight races
Lawsuits currently pending in Minnesota, Georgia, and North Carolina have the potential to disenfranchise thousands of voters.
By Jesse Valentine - January 23, 2025