Republicans want to make voting harder even in states they won in 2020
Lawmakers have used the repeated lie that the 2020 election was rife with fraud as justification for their voter suppression bills.
Since Donald Trump lost the 2020 presidential election, Republican state lawmakers across the country have introduced legislation aimed at making it harder to vote.
But it’s not just states that flipped blue that are seeing an influx of Republican-introduced voter suppression legislation.
A review by the American Independent Foundation found that Republicans have introduced and in some cases passed legislation to make it more difficult to vote in seven states Trump won in 2020. In some of the states, Trump’s margins of victory were greater than they were in 2016.
Lawmakers have used the repeated lie that the 2020 election was rife with fraud, which GOP voters now overwhelmingly believe, as justification for their voter suppression bills.
The bills’ provisions include cutting back on early voting days, requiring ID to vote by mail, and making it harder to use ballot drop boxes for absentee ballots, which voting rights experts say will have a disproportionately negative impact on Black voters.
Some go even further by making it harder to register to vote or cutting some of the different types of identification that can be used to meet voter ID requirements.
In all, voting rights activists say the nationwide effort is the biggest assault on voting rights in years, comparing the new bills to Jim Crow-era racist voter suppression efforts.
Republicans are trying to make it harder to vote in these states that Trump won in 2020.
Even though Trump expanded his margin of victory in Ohio, winning by 8 points in 2020 versus 7.5 points in 2016, Republican state Rep. Bill Seitz is planning to introduce legislation that, if signed into law, would severely restrict the use of ballot drop boxes, make voter ID requirements more stringent, and eliminate early in-person voting on the Monday before Election Day.
The bill would allow ballot drop boxes only outside county board of election offices.
Ohio Democratic Party Chair Liz Walters said in a statement, “In a state that has set the bar for extreme anti-voter laws, this proposal actively takes steps to put Ohio further back in the fight for access to the voting booth. By limiting Ohioans’ ability to vote and by sowing confusion, statehouse Republicans are once again attacking the fundamental right to vote in this state.”
Iowa was one of the first states to enact new laws making it harder to vote, with the state’s Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signing a voter suppression bill on March 8.
The law cuts the number of early voting days, slashes the actual time voters have to cast ballots on Election Day, and reduces the amount of time voters have to return absentee ballots.
A civil rights group filed a lawsuit against the law the day after it was enacted, saying that it “will impose undue and unjustified burdens on a wide range of lawful voters, including some of the state’s most vulnerable and underrepresented citizens: minority voters, elderly voters, disabled voters, voters with chronic health conditions, voters who work multiple jobs and voters who lack access to reliable transportation or consistent mail service.”
Trump expanded his victory margin in Arkansas in 2020, winning by 27.6 points in 2020 versus 26.9 points in 2016.
Bills passed by the GOP-controlled Legislature make it a crime to hand out food and drink to people waiting in line to vote; deny an absentee ballot to a voter if their signature on the application doesn’t match their signature on file for their voter registration; and ban election officials from sending out unsolicited absentee ballot applications. Republican Gov. Asa Hutchinson was reported last week to be reviewing the bills.
On April 19, Montana Republican Gov. Greg Gianforte signed legislation into law that will eliminate same-day voter registration and bar student IDs as an accepted form of voter identification.
The Montana Democratic Party immediately sued the state, saying in the lawsuit, “While these new laws will burden all Montana voters, they specifically target the youngest members of the electorate just months after they turned out to vote at record rates. There is no legitimate justification for these restrictions, much less any sufficiently weighty state interest to justify their burdens on the fundamental right to vote.”
Texas already has some of the strictest voting laws in the country. But after Trump’s victory margin in the state shrank from 9 points in 2016 to 5.6 points in 2020, Republicans in the state are seeking to make it even harder to vote.
A bill moving through the Republican-controlled state Legislature would make it ever harder to vote absentee.
While the state already allows only those with an excuse to vote by mail, Republicans want to force the disabled to submit proof of their disability in order to obtain an absentee ballot, forcing them to get a note from a doctor or the Social Security Administration.
The legislation would also cut early voting hours; eliminate drive-through voting, which more than 100,000 Texans used in the 2020 election; and ban officials from automatically sending out absentee ballot applications.
One bills introduced in the Florida state House targeted the distribution of food and drinks to voters waiting in line, but the provision was removed after the backlash to a Georgia law that criminalizes such activities.
In February, Utah — where Trump expanded his margin of victory from 17.9 points in 2016 to 20.5 points in 2020 — passed a law that would allow the state to purge its voter rolls of people the government believes are dead.
The bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Mike Winder, told the Deseret News in January that he had “heard of several cases where it has happened.” But observers warn that the Utah law makes incorrect removal of voters more likely, with the Brennan Center for Justice noting, “Because the law does not require any notice to the voters being removed, does not require auditing of the source data, and does not specify how many data points must be matched, it creates a risk that county clerks will remove the wrong names from their voter registration rolls.”
Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.
Cannabis workers across Missouri begin push to unionize dispensaries
The first day was a breeze. Sean Shannon and Danny Foster walked into several marijuana dispensaries around Missouri with their matching “Union For Cannabis Workers” shirts and talked to employees about the possibility of unionizing. “The first day, there were 57 stops amongst the teams,” said Shannon, lead organizer with UFCW Local 655, which actually […]By Rebecca Rivas - December 04, 2023
Curtis Hertel Jr. places public service over politics in Michigan congressional run
'To me, this country is craving people that are problem solvers who will work and put the partisan politics aside,' Hertel said.By Alyssa Burr - October 20, 2023
Republican Virginia Senate candidate Danny Diggs has ties to hate groups and extremists
Diggs accepted payments from anti-immigrant extremists and spoke at a pro-gun rally attended by militia groups.By Josh Israel - October 20, 2023