Trump aims to cut health funds despite vow to 'safeguard' US from new virus
Donald Trump’s proposed budget calls for cutting funding to the World Health Organization in the midst of the deadly coronavirus outbreak.
Donald Trump’s new budget proposes cutting $3 billion from global health programs, despite his repeated vows to protect Americans from the deadly new virus outbreak.
According to Foreign Policy, Trump is specifically proposing a 50% reduction in funding for the World Health Organization, the main global body fighting to contain the coronavirus outbreak, which first began in China.
Such cuts “are entirely out of touch with the threats facing our nation,” Adm. James Stavridis and Gen. Tony Zinni, co-chairs of the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition’s National Security Advisory Council, said in a statement Monday, after Trump’s proposal was released.
They added that foreign assistance “is not charity but a strategic investment in our own security that saves lives and keeps us safe.”
Trump’s proposed cuts directly contradict his previous pledges to protect Americans from the growing outbreak, which started in December and has spread to dozens of countries. More than 1,000 people have died in China alone as a result of the outbreak.
“My administration will take all necessary steps to safeguard our citizens from this threat,” Trump said about the new virus during his Feb. 4 State of the Union address.
Later, on Feb. 7, Trump told reporters that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a U.S. federal agency, was working closely with the World Health Organization and China to address the outbreak, which he called “a tough situation.”
“[China is] working really hard, and I think they are doing a very professional job,” he said. “They’re in touch with the World Organization [sic] and CDC also. We’re working together.”
Trump’s budget notably calls for a 9% cut to CDC funding.
According to Foreign Policy, Trump administration officials have defended the proposed $3 billion in cuts by pointing out that the administration is also calling for an additional $15 million in funding for the USAID Global Health Security Program, which is aimed at fighting diseases like the new coronavirus.
However, the totality of the cuts is concerning to foreign policy and global health experts.
Trump’s budget “is a waste of the paper it’s printed on,” rep. Eliot Engel, chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement, adding that if it were enacted, it would “weaken our security and leadership around the world.”
The budget is “woefully out of touch when it comes to protecting America’s interests,” Liz Schrayer, president and CEO of the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition, said in a separate statement. “Given the growing threats from the coronavirus to the rise of China and other great powers … now is not the time to take our diplomats and development tools off the playing field.”
On Tuesday, Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the head of the WHO, called the new coronavirus “a very grave threat,” noting the virus “does not respect borders or ideologies.”
In a call with reporters a day earlier, he had warned, “This is a common enemy that we can only defeat if we do it in unison and in unity.”
Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.
Recommended
Cost, access still barriers to medical care for Black Ohio women
A recent study recommended increases in Medicaid eligibility and other legislative measures to help improve health care outcomes and access for Black women in Ohio, while still spotlighting fears of discrimination among women seeking care.
By Susan Tebben, Ohio Capital Journal - October 15, 2024Texas’ abortion laws are straining the OB/GYN workforce, new study shows
More doctors are considering leaving or retiring early, while fewer medical students are applying to obstetrics and gynecology residencies in Texas.
By Eleanor Klibanoff, Texas Tribune - October 08, 2024Rogers says Medicare negotiating drug price reductions is ‘sugar high politics’
Former U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers (R-White Lake)said he was “passionately against” allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, which he referred to as “sugar high politics.”
By Jon King, Michigan Advance - October 02, 2024