Opinion: The Wisconsin Supreme Court election is crucial for protecting abortion rights
The candidate that wins the April 4 election will either confirm the status quo or shift the court’s balance to a 4-3 progressive majority.
If you’re reading this, you probably already know that the upcoming Wisconsin Supreme Court election is our chance to protect abortion rights. But what exactly does that mean? How could a single seat on the highest court of our state have such a drastic impact on reproductive health care? Let’s break it down.
With Justice Patience Roggensack’s impending retirement, the Supreme Court’s ideological balance is uncertain. Wisconsin’s seven justices are elected on a nonpartisan basis, but that’s really just in name only, considering that the political leanings and ideologies of the justices — and candidates — are widely known. Currently, the court sits at a 4-3 conservative majority, which means that whoever wins the election for Justice Roggensack’s seat will either confirm the status quo or shift the court’s balance to a 4-3 progressive majority. So what does that have to do with abortion?
Wisconsin has had a criminal abortion ban since 1849, but that ban could not be enforced following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 decision to protect the right to abortion in Roe v. Wade. The 1849 ban has been lurking in Wisconsin’s statutes since then, ready to be triggered should Roe ever fall. While some thought such a day could never come, we all know that the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization effectively ended the federal protections for abortion that had insulated Wisconsinites from the 1849 ban.
The 1849 ban makes it a felony for a doctor to perform an abortion unless the life of the pregnant person is determined to be at risk. Not the health of the pregnant person, but the life of the pregnant person. Under the ban, one has to be at risk of dying before being allowed to receive abortion care. According to a Marquette Law School poll, nearly 60% of Wisconsinites support safe and legal access to abortion care.
The Republican-majority state Legislature rebuffed efforts to repeal the 1849 ban after Dobbs. Instead, Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit challenging the 1849 ban in state courts. That legal challenge will almost certainly reach our Supreme Court, at which point the decision of whether Wisconsinites will have access to safe and legal abortion will rest in the hands of seven justices.
Erin Phillips is an attorney and founding member of Motherhood for Good. Motherhood for Good is a community of moms with a purpose-driven playbook who believe that parenting includes politics.
Cannabis workers across Missouri begin push to unionize dispensaries
The first day was a breeze. Sean Shannon and Danny Foster walked into several marijuana dispensaries around Missouri with their matching “Union For Cannabis Workers” shirts and talked to employees about the possibility of unionizing. “The first day, there were 57 stops amongst the teams,” said Shannon, lead organizer with UFCW Local 655, which actually […]By Rebecca Rivas - December 04, 2023
Curtis Hertel Jr. places public service over politics in Michigan congressional run
'To me, this country is craving people that are problem solvers who will work and put the partisan politics aside,' Hertel said.By Alyssa Burr - October 20, 2023
Republican Virginia Senate candidate Danny Diggs has ties to hate groups and extremists
Diggs accepted payments from anti-immigrant extremists and spoke at a pro-gun rally attended by militia groups.By Josh Israel - October 20, 2023