Susan Collins said Kavanaugh would respect abortion precedent. She was wrong.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) promised that Kavanaugh would adhere to abortion precedent. That promise was broken on Monday.
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh voted against abortion rights precedent the court had set just four years earlier — breaking a promise Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) said he had made in order to gain her confirmation vote.
During the confirmation process, Collins said she decided to vote in favor of Kavanaugh because he told her he believed “the concept of precedent is rooted in Article III of the Constitution” — and she said that meant he wouldn’t vote to overturn abortion rights.
“He also believes that it is not sufficient — since I asked him this directly — for five sitting judges to believe that an earlier decision was incorrectly decided. He said it would have to be grievously wrong and deeply inconsistent,” Collins told Bloomberg News’ Steven Dennis ahead of her vote to confirm Kavanaugh.
However, on Monday, Kavanaugh was one of four conservative justices to vote to uphold a Louisiana abortion law that would have left the state with just one abortion clinic. The Supreme Court had struck down an almost identical law in Texas just four years ago, meaning Kavanaugh voted against recent Supreme Court precedent.
Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the Court’s liberal justices to vote to strike down the Louisiana law, directly citing his belief in upholding precedent.
“Today’s case is a challenge from several abortion clinics and providers to a Louisiana law nearly identical to the Texas law struck down four years ago,” Roberts wrote in a concurring opinion.
“The legal doctrine of stare decisis requires us, absent special circumstances, to treat like cases alike,” Roberts continued, citing the Latin term for the legal principle of adhering to past precedent. “The Louisiana law imposes a burden on access to abortion just as severe as that imposed by the Texas law, for the same reasons. Therefore Louisiana’s law cannot stand under our precedents.”
Collins’ vote to confirm Kavanaugh has dogged her 2020 reelection bid.
While Collins has glided to reelection in past cycles, her 2020 race against likely Democratic opponent Sara Gideon, Maine’s current state House speaker, is fiercely competitive.
A poll from October 2019 found that following Collins’ vote to confirm Kavanaugh, her approval rating in the state took a steep fall — in large part thanks to a loss of support from Democrats, who once crossed party lines to back her. The nonpartisan political handicapping outlet the Cook Political Report rates Collins’ race a toss-up.
Kavanaugh’s vote against abortion rights precedent now gives Democrats even more ammunition to use against Collins heading into the election.
“Once again, we have been proven right about Brett Kavanaugh and Susan Collins has been proven wrong,” Brian Fallon, a Democratic strategist and executive director of Demand Justice, a progressive group that wants to “restore the ideological balance and legitimacy of the federal courts,” tweeted. “Vote her out.”
Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.
Recommended
Fate of ‘game changer’ women’s health care bill in hands of Missouri Senate
A bill that would improve health care access for Missouri women almost died in the House after some lawmakers conflated birth control legislation with abortion medication
By Anna Spoerre, Missouri Independent - May 08, 2024Trump leaves door open to banning medication abortion nationwide
Donald Trump is planning to release more details in the weeks ahead about how his administration would regulate access to medication abortion, according to comments he made during a lengthy interview with Time magazine published Tuesday.
By Jennifer Shutt, States Newsroom - April 30, 2024Ohio doctors fear effects of emergency abortion care case set to go before U.S. Supreme Court
A federal law that allows emergency departments to treat patients without regard to their ability to pay will be under U.S. Supreme Court scrutiny this week, and Ohio doctors are concerned about the case’s local impact on emergency abortion care.
By Susan Tebben, Ohio Capital Journal - April 23, 2024