Lawmakers tell Trump to cancel costly 4th of July 'vanity project' in DC
Members of Congress say Trump’s plan will cost the District of Columbia millions of dollars and take resources away from the coronavirus response.
Ten Democratic lawmakers whose districts and states border Washington, D.C., called for Donald Trump to cancel the massive July 4 display he’s set to host on the National Mall, saying it’s inappropriate to hold it during the COVID-19 pandemic.
“The administration, including your agencies, should be focused on helping American families, not on a vanity project for the president,” reads a letter from the lawmakers, who include: Maryland Democratic Sens. Chris Van Hollen and Benjamin Cardin of Maryland; Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton of the District of Columbia; Maryland Democratic Reps. David Trone, Anthony Brown, Jamie Raskin, and Steny Hoyer; and Virginia Democratic Reps. Don Beyer, Gerry Connolly, and Jennifer Wexton.
In advocating against holding the event, the lawmakers said it will cost Washington, D.C., millions of dollars the city doesn’t have as it faces a budget shortfall thanks to the coronavirus fallout.
They added that given coronavirus cases in the region are growing, it’s unsafe to have thousands come to the city and risk not only spreading the virus in D.C. but also bringing it back to the areas they were visiting from.
“We believe such an event would needlessly risk the health and safety of thousands of Americans. Further, this event would come at the cost of millions of taxpayer dollars while we are facing an unprecedented economic downturn due to the pandemic,” the lawmakers wrote in the letter.
Trump first held the “Salute to America” in 2019, which drew a barrage of criticism as he appeared to use the military to bolster his own political standing. The District of Columbia had held its own massive fireworks display for years, but Trump inserted himself into the festivities by organizing his own concert and giving a speech at the Lincoln Memorial.
Trump had wanted the event to include a military parade down the streets of the city that included tanks and other military vehicles, even though experts said those vehicles could damage city streets. The parade was eventually nixed, and instead, smaller tanks were stationed nearby the celebration.
The event ultimately cost the federal government millions. It also cost D.C. $1.7 million, which wound up wiping out a fund the city had to defend against terrorist threats.
This year, members of Congress said taking from D.C.’s budget would be wrong.
“With the catastrophic hit that our economy has taken due to the COVID-19 crisis, it is not only financially wasteful to plan a second ‘Salute to America’ event, but has the potential to again inappropriately pull funds from necessary accounts already under financial strain,” the letter reads.”
Washington, D.C., for its part, received a fraction of the coronavirus aid it could have gotten because it is classified as a territory rather than a state.
The city, whose 700,000 population is bigger than two states, got $700 million less in relief due to its classification, according to the Associated Press.
Trump has said D.C., “will never be a state,” claiming that doing so would only increase Democratic representation in Congress.
Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.
Recommended
Cost, access still barriers to medical care for Black Ohio women
A recent study recommended increases in Medicaid eligibility and other legislative measures to help improve health care outcomes and access for Black women in Ohio, while still spotlighting fears of discrimination among women seeking care.
By Susan Tebben, Ohio Capital Journal - October 15, 2024Texas’ abortion laws are straining the OB/GYN workforce, new study shows
More doctors are considering leaving or retiring early, while fewer medical students are applying to obstetrics and gynecology residencies in Texas.
By Eleanor Klibanoff, Texas Tribune - October 08, 2024Rogers says Medicare negotiating drug price reductions is ‘sugar high politics’
Former U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers (R-White Lake)said he was “passionately against” allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, which he referred to as “sugar high politics.”
By Jon King, Michigan Advance - October 02, 2024