search
Sections List
American Journal News

37 Senate Republicans vote to block bill to protect same-sex and interracial marriages

The Senate advanced the Respect for Marriage Act on Wednesday.

By Josh Israel - November 16, 2022
Share
Tammy Baldwin
Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) speaks during a press conference in the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Nov. 15, 2022. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via AP Images)

Sixty-two senators voted on Wednesday to advance a bill that would explicitly protect same-sex and interracial marriages. But 37 senators — all Republicans — voted against cloture and to end debate of the Respect for Marriage Act, introduced to prevent the U.S. Supreme Court from further eroding constitutional rights affirmed in precedent.

With 60 votes needed to advance most legislation in the Senate, the bill now moves forward.

The legislation would repeal the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which allowed both the federal government and the states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages. While declared unconstitutional in previous Supreme Court rulings, the law remains part of the U.S. Code. The bill states:

No person acting under color of State law may deny—

 

“(1) full faith and credit to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State pertaining to a marriage between 2 individuals, on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals; or

 

“(2) a right or claim arising from such a marriage on the basis that such marriage would not be recognized under the law of that State on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals.”

The House of Representatives passed a version of the legislation 267-157 on July 19. Every Democratic member and 47 Republicans voted yes; all 157 no votes came from Republican members.

A bipartisan group of senators reached an agreement on an amended version of the bill on Nov. 14, adding language to ensure that no religious organization is forced to participate in weddings it does not recognize.

Civil rights advocates say the bill is needed to guard constitutional rights against an increasingly right-wing Supreme Court, whose majority already struck down a nearly 50-year-old abortion rights precedent with its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization in June.

The Supreme Court has expressly affirmed both the right to interracial marriage (in Loving v. Virginia in 1967) and the right to same-sex marriage (in United States v. Windsor in 2013 and Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015). But like the abortion rights protections affirmed in Roe v. Wade in 1973, these precedents are subject to the will of a right-wing court majority filled out by former President Donald Trump with the appointment of Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh.

Justice Clarence Thomas, in his concurring opinion in the Dobbs case, expressly called for the Supreme Court to reconsider and overturn the same-sex marriage rulings and other privacy-related decisions.

Cases like Griswold v. Connecticut, (right of married persons to obtain contraceptives); Lawrence v. Texas, (right to engage in private, consensual sexual acts); and Obergefell v. Hodges, (right to same-sex marriage), are not at issue. … For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including GriswoldLawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,” we have a duty to “correct the error” established in those precedents. After overruling these demonstrably erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myriad rights that our substantive due process cases have generated.

Rather than say their opposition was driven by their staunch opposition to LGBTQ rights, Senate Republicans framed the bill as unnecessary, distracting, and somehow elitist.

Consistently anti-LGBTQ Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) called the bill a “stupid waste of time” and attacked Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who had questioned Rubio’s “waste of time” statement, tweeting that Buttigieg “wants us to focus on a fake problem” and saying in a video clip: “I’m going to focus on the real problems. I’m not going to focus on the agenda that [is] dictated by a bunch of affluent elite liberals and a bunch of Marxist misfits who today, sadly, control the agenda of the modern Democratic Party.”

On his official Senate website, Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT) said in a statement: “I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I’m opposed to this bill and believe it’s another attempt by Speaker Pelosi and the Democrats to distract the American people from the inflation crisis, energy crisis and the southern border crisis they’ve created.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) called the bill “such a ploy to distract the press from the issues before us” and told CNN he wouldn’t answer the question of whether he would vote for it: “This is a pure messaging bill by a party which has failed on substantive issues, be it inflation, crime or the border, and now are looking for cultural issues in order to somehow do better in November. … It’s such a silly messaging bill, I’m just not going to address that.”

Both voted no on Wednesday.

Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), the first openly gay person elected to the U.S. Senate and the lead sponsor of the bill, rejected those criticisms.

Baldwin said that she spoke to Rubio right after he said the bill was a “stupid waste of time” on July 20. According to CNN, Baldwin said: “I said that, ‘The recent Supreme Court decision eroded a constitutional right to privacy. There’s a whole bunch of cases that have been decided based on a constitutional right to privacy that are in jeopardy,’ which he disagrees with.”

A 2021 poll by the nonpartisan research organization PRRI found that 68% of U.S. adults now support marriage equality for same-sex couples, compared to just 30% who oppose it.

A final vote is likely later this week. If the amended version passes, it would then go back to the House for a vote before President Joe Biden could sign it.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.


AJ News
Get the latest news here first.

Tai News

Newsletter
Read More
Assemblywoman-elect Luanne Peterpaul will be first out lesbian in New Jersey Legislature

Assemblywoman-elect Luanne Peterpaul will be first out lesbian in New Jersey Legislature

By Sophie Nieto-Muñoz - November 20, 2023
House Speaker Mike Johnson has long opposed abortion and LGBTQ+ rights

House Speaker Mike Johnson has long opposed abortion and LGBTQ+ rights

By Amanda Becker, The 19th - November 02, 2023
Philadelphia mayor signs executive order protecting access to gender-affirming care

Philadelphia mayor signs executive order protecting access to gender-affirming care

By Will Fritz - October 19, 2023
FBI data shows an uptick in anti-LGBTQ+ hate crimes in 2022

FBI data shows an uptick in anti-LGBTQ+ hate crimes in 2022

By Will Fritz - October 19, 2023
Last week in LGBTQ+ rights: Federal court upholds injunction against Florida drag ban

Last week in LGBTQ+ rights: Federal court upholds injunction against Florida drag ban

By Will Fritz - October 17, 2023
Wisconsin State Assembly passes anti-trans bills

Wisconsin State Assembly passes anti-trans bills

By Will Fritz - October 16, 2023
AJ News
Latest
Florida Sen. Rick Scott backs Donald Trump in revived push to repeal Obamacare

Florida Sen. Rick Scott backs Donald Trump in revived push to repeal Obamacare

By Jesse Valentine - November 30, 2023
Tate Reeves took donations from power company that hiked customer rates

Tate Reeves took donations from power company that hiked customer rates

By Jesse Valentine - November 06, 2023
Daniel Cameron ran on depoliticizing the Kentucky AG’s office. He made it more political.

Daniel Cameron ran on depoliticizing the Kentucky AG’s office. He made it more political.

By Jesse Valentine - November 03, 2023
Republican operatives sound every alarm on current trajectory of 2023 governor’s race

Republican operatives sound every alarm on current trajectory of 2023 governor’s race

By Adam Ganucheau, Mississippi Today - October 24, 2023
Michigan Republican US Senate candidate Peter Meijer backed strict abortion bans

Michigan Republican US Senate candidate Peter Meijer backed strict abortion bans

By Jesse Valentine - November 30, 2023
Abortion opponents push state lawmakers to promote unproven ‘abortion reversal’

Abortion opponents push state lawmakers to promote unproven ‘abortion reversal’

By Anna Claire Vollers - November 30, 2023
Biden campaign pivots to focus on healthcare

Biden campaign pivots to focus on healthcare

By Kim Lyons - November 30, 2023
Abortion advocates submit ballot issue affirming right to terminate pregnancy in Montana

Abortion advocates submit ballot issue affirming right to terminate pregnancy in Montana

By Nicole Girten - November 27, 2023
Proposed Arkansas ballot measure would make abortion access a constitutional right

Proposed Arkansas ballot measure would make abortion access a constitutional right

By Tess Vrbin - November 27, 2023