search
Sections List
American Journal News

37 Senate Republicans vote to block bill to protect same-sex and interracial marriages

The Senate advanced the Respect for Marriage Act on Wednesday.

By Josh Israel - November 16, 2022
Share
Tammy Baldwin
Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) speaks during a press conference in the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Nov. 15, 2022. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via AP Images)

Sixty-two senators voted on Wednesday to advance a bill that would explicitly protect same-sex and interracial marriages. But 37 senators — all Republicans — voted against cloture and to end debate of the Respect for Marriage Act, introduced to prevent the U.S. Supreme Court from further eroding constitutional rights affirmed in precedent.

With 60 votes needed to advance most legislation in the Senate, the bill now moves forward.

The legislation would repeal the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which allowed both the federal government and the states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages. While declared unconstitutional in previous Supreme Court rulings, the law remains part of the U.S. Code. The bill states:

No person acting under color of State law may deny—

 

“(1) full faith and credit to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State pertaining to a marriage between 2 individuals, on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals; or

 

“(2) a right or claim arising from such a marriage on the basis that such marriage would not be recognized under the law of that State on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals.”

The House of Representatives passed a version of the legislation 267-157 on July 19. Every Democratic member and 47 Republicans voted yes; all 157 no votes came from Republican members.

A bipartisan group of senators reached an agreement on an amended version of the bill on Nov. 14, adding language to ensure that no religious organization is forced to participate in weddings it does not recognize.

Civil rights advocates say the bill is needed to guard constitutional rights against an increasingly right-wing Supreme Court, whose majority already struck down a nearly 50-year-old abortion rights precedent with its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization in June.

The Supreme Court has expressly affirmed both the right to interracial marriage (in Loving v. Virginia in 1967) and the right to same-sex marriage (in United States v. Windsor in 2013 and Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015). But like the abortion rights protections affirmed in Roe v. Wade in 1973, these precedents are subject to the will of a right-wing court majority filled out by former President Donald Trump with the appointment of Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh.

Justice Clarence Thomas, in his concurring opinion in the Dobbs case, expressly called for the Supreme Court to reconsider and overturn the same-sex marriage rulings and other privacy-related decisions.

Cases like Griswold v. Connecticut, (right of married persons to obtain contraceptives); Lawrence v. Texas, (right to engage in private, consensual sexual acts); and Obergefell v. Hodges, (right to same-sex marriage), are not at issue. … For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including GriswoldLawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,” we have a duty to “correct the error” established in those precedents. After overruling these demonstrably erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myriad rights that our substantive due process cases have generated.

Rather than say their opposition was driven by their staunch opposition to LGBTQ rights, Senate Republicans framed the bill as unnecessary, distracting, and somehow elitist.

Consistently anti-LGBTQ Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) called the bill a “stupid waste of time” and attacked Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who had questioned Rubio’s “waste of time” statement, tweeting that Buttigieg “wants us to focus on a fake problem” and saying in a video clip: “I’m going to focus on the real problems. I’m not going to focus on the agenda that [is] dictated by a bunch of affluent elite liberals and a bunch of Marxist misfits who today, sadly, control the agenda of the modern Democratic Party.”

On his official Senate website, Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT) said in a statement: “I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I’m opposed to this bill and believe it’s another attempt by Speaker Pelosi and the Democrats to distract the American people from the inflation crisis, energy crisis and the southern border crisis they’ve created.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) called the bill “such a ploy to distract the press from the issues before us” and told CNN he wouldn’t answer the question of whether he would vote for it: “This is a pure messaging bill by a party which has failed on substantive issues, be it inflation, crime or the border, and now are looking for cultural issues in order to somehow do better in November. … It’s such a silly messaging bill, I’m just not going to address that.”

Both voted no on Wednesday.

Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), the first openly gay person elected to the U.S. Senate and the lead sponsor of the bill, rejected those criticisms.

Baldwin said that she spoke to Rubio right after he said the bill was a “stupid waste of time” on July 20. According to CNN, Baldwin said: “I said that, ‘The recent Supreme Court decision eroded a constitutional right to privacy. There’s a whole bunch of cases that have been decided based on a constitutional right to privacy that are in jeopardy,’ which he disagrees with.”

A 2021 poll by the nonpartisan research organization PRRI found that 68% of U.S. adults now support marriage equality for same-sex couples, compared to just 30% who oppose it.

A final vote is likely later this week. If the amended version passes, it would then go back to the House for a vote before President Joe Biden could sign it.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.


AJ News
Subscribe to our newsletter.
Read More
Amid fraught landscape, school districts react differently to transgender sports ban law

Amid fraught landscape, school districts react differently to transgender sports ban law

By Ethan DeWitt, New Hampshire Bulletin - October 04, 2024
Federal judge dismisses challenge to Tennessee law barring K-12 trans kids from restrooms of choice

Federal judge dismisses challenge to Tennessee law barring K-12 trans kids from restrooms of choice

By Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout - September 27, 2024
Patients hurt by Missouri’s ban on gender-affirming care, providers testify

Patients hurt by Missouri’s ban on gender-affirming care, providers testify

By Annelise Hanshaw, Missouri Independent - September 27, 2024
Republicans pour money into attacking Texas Democrats on LGBTQ+ issues ahead of Election Day

Republicans pour money into attacking Texas Democrats on LGBTQ+ issues ahead of Election Day

By Matthew Choi, The Texas Tribune - September 18, 2024
Beshear signs order banning conversion therapy on Kentucky minors

Beshear signs order banning conversion therapy on Kentucky minors

By Sarah Ladd, Kentucky Lantern - September 18, 2024
Idaho governor signs executive order opposing Title IX protections for LGBTQ+ athletes

Idaho governor signs executive order opposing Title IX protections for LGBTQ+ athletes

By Mia Maldonado, Idaho Capital Sun - August 28, 2024
AJ News
Latest
Rep. Bresnahan sold shares in PA companies ahead of market drop

Rep. Bresnahan sold shares in PA companies ahead of market drop

By Jesse Valentine - May 21, 2025
Senate Republicans confirm convicted felon as U.S. ambassador

Senate Republicans confirm convicted felon as U.S. ambassador

By Jesse Valentine - May 20, 2025
Texas women face prosecution for abortions if new bill becomes law

Texas women face prosecution for abortions if new bill becomes law

By Bonnie Fuller - May 16, 2025
It’s not just Medicaid—House Republicans want to cut food stamps too

It’s not just Medicaid—House Republicans want to cut food stamps too

By Jesse Valentine - May 15, 2025
Disability advocates arrested protesting GOP Medicaid cuts

Disability advocates arrested protesting GOP Medicaid cuts

By Jesse Valentine - May 14, 2025
Republican Bill Huizenga cheers power plant funds he tried to block

Republican Bill Huizenga cheers power plant funds he tried to block

By Jesse Valentine - May 12, 2025
Jack Ciattarelli called harmful tariffs a “grand experiment”

Jack Ciattarelli called harmful tariffs a “grand experiment”

By Jesse Valentine - May 09, 2025
Paul LePage, a Medicaid critic, launches congressional bid in Maine

Paul LePage, a Medicaid critic, launches congressional bid in Maine

By Jesse Valentine - May 06, 2025
Earle-Sears ignored trans issues in office—now she uses them as a wedge

Earle-Sears ignored trans issues in office—now she uses them as a wedge

By Jesse Valentine - May 05, 2025
Trump effectively shuts down campaign finance watchdog

Trump effectively shuts down campaign finance watchdog

By Jesse Valentine - April 30, 2025
Ciattarelli wants a DOGE-style commission to crack down on New Jersey Medicaid recipients

Ciattarelli wants a DOGE-style commission to crack down on New Jersey Medicaid recipients

By Jesse Valentine - April 30, 2025
House Republicans roll out new plan to decimate Medicaid

House Republicans roll out new plan to decimate Medicaid

By Jesse Valentine - April 24, 2025
Trump White House plans to garnish wages of student loan borrowers

Trump White House plans to garnish wages of student loan borrowers

By Jesse Valentine - April 22, 2025
Megadonor embroiled in ethics scandal gave thousands to Winsome Earle-Sears

Megadonor embroiled in ethics scandal gave thousands to Winsome Earle-Sears

By Jesse Valentine - April 21, 2025
“I Was Terrified To Get Pregnant Again After Having to Flee Tennessee for a Life-Saving Abortion”

“I Was Terrified To Get Pregnant Again After Having to Flee Tennessee for a Life-Saving Abortion”

By Bonnie Fuller - April 21, 2025
Goldman Sachs: Trump’s tariffs will lead to job losses

Goldman Sachs: Trump’s tariffs will lead to job losses

By Jesse Valentine - April 17, 2025
Democrats take stand for wrongly deported Maryland man

Democrats take stand for wrongly deported Maryland man

By Jesse Valentine - April 16, 2025
North Carolina law would make it illegal for Democratic AG to sue Trump

North Carolina law would make it illegal for Democratic AG to sue Trump

By Jesse Valentine - April 11, 2025
Older Americans suffer under Republican slash and burn policies

Older Americans suffer under Republican slash and burn policies

By Jesse Valentine - April 09, 2025
Scott Brown got Trump’s tariff plans for New Zealand very wrong

Scott Brown got Trump’s tariff plans for New Zealand very wrong

By Jesse Valentine - April 08, 2025
Trump admin canceled Social Security contracts to punish Maine governor

Trump admin canceled Social Security contracts to punish Maine governor

By Jesse Valentine - April 03, 2025
Senate Republicans vote to eliminate cap on overdraft fees

Senate Republicans vote to eliminate cap on overdraft fees

By Jesse Valentine - April 03, 2025
Forced to carry a dying baby, this Texas mother of four says she didn’t think it could happen to her

Forced to carry a dying baby, this Texas mother of four says she didn’t think it could happen to her

By Bonnie Fuller - March 28, 2025
Despite pleas from women and doctors, Texas may implement even more abortion restrictions

Despite pleas from women and doctors, Texas may implement even more abortion restrictions

By Bonnie Fuller - March 28, 2025