Trump administration OK leaving women out of drafting health care bill
The way Senate Republicans are trying to push through their super secret bill to repeal health care is egregious for a number of reasons. But their exclusion of women from the process is especially odious. The Senate version of the bill is being written in secret, by a group of 13 Republican men and no women. […]

But their exclusion of women from the process is especially odious. The Senate version of the bill is being written in secret, by a group of 13 Republican men and no women. Even female senators from their own party have no voice in crafting the bill.
And that, according to Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price, is just fine. In an exchange with Sen. Brian Schatz (D-HI), during an appropriations hearing, Price refused to denounce that terrible decision by his fellow Republicans, absurdly claiming it is not his “role to engage in the process.”
.@SecPriceMD refuses to say if women should have a seat at the table writing the Senate’s secret tax-cuts-for-billionaires #TrumpCare bill. pic.twitter.com/aLKBhkmVjB
— American Bridge (@American_Bridge) June 15, 2017
SCHATZ: You’re a physician, you’re the secretary, you’re the former chair of the budget committee, you’ve worked on a bipartisan basis. So I’m just going to ask you a couple of questions related to your personal opinion around lawmaking. Do you think that that 13-person group would benefit from the perspective of a woman?
PRICE: As I said to another question that was asked, as a member of the Article II branch of the government, I will leave the Article I branch functioning to the Article I branch.
SCHATZ: You can’t answer the question of whether you think a health care discussion would benefit from having a woman involved or not?
PRICE: As I say, this is an internal issue for the legislative branch, for the Senate of the United States, and it’s not my role to engage in the process, the tactics that go on here in the legislative branch.
It is not a trick to question to ask whether women should have input on a health care bill that will affect millions of Americans and a sixth of the economy. Especially when male legislators are infamous for not understanding even the most basic facts about women’s health care — like contraception, pregnancy, and how to screen for breast cancer.
In March, for example, Republican Rep. John Shikmus asked why men should have to pay for prenatal care, and he’s hardly the first Republican to say out loud that men should be exempt from sharing the health costs of pregnancy and child birth.
In 2009, during the initial debate over Obamacare, then-Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona infamously claimed, “I don’t need maternity care, and so requiring that to be in my insurance policy is something that I don’t need and will make the policy more expensive.”
Michigan Democrat Debbie Stabenow righteously responded, “I think your mom probably did.”
And that is precisely why it is inappropriate and absurd to exclude women from the process of writing health care legislation. It should not be difficult for the Trump administration to admit that.
Given the administration’s handling of this effort to repeal Obamacare — pushing for draconian cuts to Medicaid, discrimination against people with pre-existing conditions, and kicking 23 million Americans off their insurance, all in secret — it’s no wonder that a new poll shows 66 percent of Americans, including a third of Republicans, don’t approve.
And the fact that the administration does not care whether women have a voice in the process only makes it look that much worse.
Recommended

Cost, access still barriers to medical care for Black Ohio women
A recent study recommended increases in Medicaid eligibility and other legislative measures to help improve health care outcomes and access for Black women in Ohio, while still spotlighting fears of discrimination among women seeking care.
By Susan Tebben, Ohio Capital Journal - October 15, 2024
Texas’ abortion laws are straining the OB/GYN workforce, new study shows
More doctors are considering leaving or retiring early, while fewer medical students are applying to obstetrics and gynecology residencies in Texas.
By Eleanor Klibanoff, Texas Tribune - October 08, 2024
Rogers says Medicare negotiating drug price reductions is ‘sugar high politics’
Former U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers (R-White Lake)said he was “passionately against” allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, which he referred to as “sugar high politics.”
By Jon King, Michigan Advance - October 02, 2024