FDA warns that White House test Trump keeps pushing may not be accurate
The tests the White House is relying on to keep the virus from Trump and pence missed 48% of positive cases.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Thursday issued a warning saying that the rapid coronavirus tests the White House has been using may produce inaccurate results.
The warning comes after a New York University study found the Abbott ID Now tests used by the White House missed as many as 48% of positive coronavirus cases.
“We are still evaluating the information about inaccurate results and are in direct communications with Abbott about this important issue,” Tim Stenzel, director of the Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health at the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in a news release. “We will continue to study the data available and are working with the company to create additional mechanisms for studying the test.”
Ultimately, while Stenzel warned about the possible inaccurate results from the Abbott tests, he added that they may still “correctly identify many positive cases in minutes.”
“Negative results,” he explained, will simply need to be “confirmed with a high-sensitivity authorized molecular test.”
Trump has touted the Abbott test numerous times, including at a March 30 coronavirus task force briefing at the White House where he called it “incredible” and “highly accurate” and “not nearly as disturbing to do as the other tests.”
As recently as April 30, Trump was boasting that the test was better than those he claimed were left behind by the Obama administration. “That didn’t exist eight weeks ago, and now it’s like the rage. Everybody wants that test,” he said.
He claimed the prior administration had left them “with bad, broken tests and obsolete tests” but did not elaborate or clarify to what he was referring.
Testing — which public health experts say is key to identifying and isolating the coronavirus to stop its spread — has been a big problem for the Trump administration.
In the early days of the outbreak, testing was scarce and few could obtain it. Even after the Centers for Disease Control began shipping test kits to states, a flaw in those kits forced them to reverse course, further delaying the process.
And while testing availability has since increased, experts say it’s not nearly at the levels needed to safely get the country’s economy back up and running.
“You can’t just take the national number and scale it to states by their population. You have to base it on the size of the outbreak in a state,” Ashish Jha, director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, told STAT News in late April.
In order to catch every new infection, he added, “you would need more than 300 million tests a day. … That’s an interesting theoretical exercise but since it’s not going to happen, it’s policy-irrelevant. If you say that, people stop listening.”
Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.
Pumping the brakes: Ohio House Speaker dismisses effort to limit court jurisdiction on Issue 1
Ohio House Speaker Jason Stephens threw cold water on a bid to thwart the recent abortion rights amendment Issue 1. Instead of attempting to deny the courts’ jurisdiction or rushing to the ballot with a repeal effort, Stephens argued lawmakers should focus on maternal and early childhood care.By Nick Evans - November 15, 2023
House Speaker Mike Johnson has long opposed abortion and LGBTQ+ rights
Before the newly elected U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson was in public office, the Louisiana Republican’s restrictive stances on gender identity, abortion and sexuality were honed at the conservative Christian legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, where he served as a senior spokesperson and attorney. Alliance Defending Freedom, or ADF, is the legal force behind dozens […]By Amanda Becker, The 19th - November 02, 2023
Wisconsin mom puts her disabled daughter on contraception due to abortion laws
About 80% of women with some form of intellectual disability have been sexually assaulted, according to a peer-reviewed paper.By Rebekah Sager - October 11, 2023