Abortion is legal — but it's already impossible to get one in South Dakota
Abortion doesn’t need to be abolished to make it unavailable.
In March and April of 2020, at least 11 conservative-leaning states used the coronavirus pandemic to try to ban abortion, usually by falsely claiming that it was a “nonessential” procedure and medical resources needed to be conserved. These bans have all expired or are not being enforced, so abortion access has returned to those states.
In South Dakota, though, there was no need for a ban. There, the availability of abortion is so fragile that access simply never came back once the pandemic made it difficult.
South Dakota only has one abortion clinic, and abortions haven’t been available there since March. The clinic has no doctors who live in the state.
Emily Bisek, a spokesperson for Planned Parenthood, said, “there’s a stigma in South Dakota, and the onerous restrictions on the care itself make the procedure more time-intensive and challenging to provide.”
Instead, doctors from Minnesota have traveled there roughly weekly. This isn’t a new development. Doctors have been flying in and out of South Dakota for 25 years. In 2006, 70-year-old Miriam McCreary came out of retirement and began traveling from Minneapolis to South Dakota twice monthly to perform abortions. By 2015, four Minnesota doctors were traveling to South Dakota twice a month to provide the procedure.
In March of this year, Planned Parenthood, which runs the only clinic left in the state, decided to stop having doctors travel to South Dakota because they were concerned for doctor and patient safety during the pandemic.
Even before the coronavirus, the state was doing everything it could to make abortion nearly impossible. The state has mandatory counseling and a 72-hour waiting period. There’s a ban on almost all abortions after 20 weeks. There’s a parental notification law. And since the state also bans telemedicine for the use of medication abortions, there’s no way doctors can provide services while out of state.
As the nomination of anti-abortion Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett progresses, there is a good deal of focus on what happens if Roe v. Wade is overturned. South Dakota is proof that abortion doesn’t need to be abolished to make it unavailable.
If states simply make the procedure nearly — but not wholly — impossible to obtain, any imbalance or disturbance in availability can eradicate access. And, as South Dakota is currently experiencing the worst per capita outbreak of coronavirus in the country, the likelihood doctors will be able to fly in and out to provide abortion services remains low.
It’s a reminder that abortion access in many states is already so tenuous that there’s no real need for a new Supreme Court justice to stop abortions from happening — they already aren’t.
Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.
Pumping the brakes: Ohio House Speaker dismisses effort to limit court jurisdiction on Issue 1
Ohio House Speaker Jason Stephens threw cold water on a bid to thwart the recent abortion rights amendment Issue 1. Instead of attempting to deny the courts’ jurisdiction or rushing to the ballot with a repeal effort, Stephens argued lawmakers should focus on maternal and early childhood care.By Nick Evans - November 15, 2023
House Speaker Mike Johnson has long opposed abortion and LGBTQ+ rights
Before the newly elected U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson was in public office, the Louisiana Republican’s restrictive stances on gender identity, abortion and sexuality were honed at the conservative Christian legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, where he served as a senior spokesperson and attorney. Alliance Defending Freedom, or ADF, is the legal force behind dozens […]By Amanda Becker, The 19th - November 02, 2023
Wisconsin mom puts her disabled daughter on contraception due to abortion laws
About 80% of women with some form of intellectual disability have been sexually assaulted, according to a peer-reviewed paper.By Rebekah Sager - October 11, 2023